I've simplified this to a simply supported beam, which I'm assuming is correct.
3.
Part ( a ) of the figure to the right shows a simply supported beam with a unit load traveling across it.
4.
So if for example, a simply supported beam has a uniform load on it but also a nodal load on 1 support.
5.
This analysis was done for a specific point on a simply supported beam, but the concept can be extended to arbitrary structures.
6.
Therefore, a point of large deflection can be chosen, and it does not need to be the center of a simply supported beam.
7.
Cantilever construction allows for overhanging structures without external bracing, in contrast to constructions supported at both ends with loads applied between the supports, such as a simply supported beam found in a post and lintel system.
8.
A simply supported beam of span 6m carries a central point load of 40kn . determine the collapse load as well as the plastic moment caused by the collapse load Preceding talk ) 00 : 16, 10 April 2010 ( UTC)
9.
This is what is don't in example 1 in this link, a simply supported beam with a single point load . http : / / www . freestudy . co . uk / engineering % 20science % 20h1 / outcome % 201 % 20t3 . pdf can the same method be used if there were 3 point loads of varying magnitudes at random places along the beam ? Preceding talk ) 20 : 47, 10 March 2014 ( UTC)
मोबाइल